Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts

Friday, 2 May 2014

Context of Practise 2: 3,000 Word Consumerism Essay

How does consumerism manipulate our instinctual desires to create false needs?

‘If you’re like most people, you think that advertising has no influence on you. This is what advertisers want you to believe.’
(Kilbourne, 2000, p33)

As stated by Kilbourne, the intention of advertising is to influence the customers desire to buy something believing that it will improve their quality of life. This essay will respond to how psychology and advertising have merged to produce a consumerist society and how this has influenced advertising and design today.

Advertising plays on the idea that we need something to make us happy based on the theories of Sigmund Freud. Freud believed that humans had hidden primitive instincts and by repressing these desires, it can lead to chaos in our society. In chapter 2 of the book, ‘Civilizations and Its Discontent’, Freud discussed the theory of The Pleasure Principle. This is the idea that ‘Life, as we find it, is to hard for us; it brings us too many pains, disappointments and impossible measures’ (Freud, 2004, p14) creating a tension between civilization and the individual as humans will always be dissatisfied. To achieve ‘what we call happiness, in the strictest sense of the word, arises from the fairly sudden satisfaction of pent-up’ (Freud, 2004, p16). Due to the way that raw human desire is incompatible with social convention, humans cannot realize these needs therefore ‘men are accustomed to moderate their claims of happiness- just as the pleasure principle itself, indeed, under the influence of the external world, changed into a modest reality principle’ (Freud, 2004, p17).  This means that society dictates the way that these needs can be somewhat fulfilled. He concluded that our actions are based on our instinctual desires and, if they are fulfilled in a socially acceptable way then we will be contented.

Freud’s theory was applied to advertising by Edward Bernays, who ‘used his uncle’s ideas in a commercial realm to predict, then adjust, the way people believed and behaved’ (Tye, 2002, pviii) as he was ‘convinced that understanding the instinct and symbols that motivate an individual could help him shape the behavior of the masses’ (Tye, 2002, p9). The key to Bernays success was that, through Freud’s theories, he understood his audience because as a society ‘we accept a standardized code of social conduct to which we conform most of the time’ (Bernays, 2005, p39) and the way that society is structured is the way that we approach purchasing. Bernays established techniques used in advertising such as how people usually follow a trusted leader, which introduced celebrity promotion to advertising as well as targeting people, directly by using emphasis and immediacy within the persuasion of adverts. He achieved this in the cigarette industry where he changed public perspective on women smokers by dreaming up the ‘Torches of Freedom’ campaign as it was believed that ‘ the emancipation of women has suppressed many of the feminine desires. More women do the same work that men do. Feminine traits are masked. Cigarettes, which are equated with men, become torches of freedom’ (Dr. A. A.Brill in Tye, 2002, p28). The campaign itself involved women of all walks of life smoking outside in public under the rouse that it was to combat prejudice, which made it a success- it wasn’t realized at the time that he was selling the product, using the event to ‘rob consumers of their own free will, helping the clients predict, then manipulate, the very way their customers thought and acted’ (Tye, 2002, p97).

From Freud’s theories and Bernays’ application, advertising has developed by using this concept to target aspects of modern life. In chapter 7 of ‘The Hidden Persuaders’, Vance Packard identifies eight desires that are hidden within modern marketing. These features are; selling emotional security, when the consumer feels a sense of safety and reassurance from having possession of the product; selling reassurance of worth, giving the user a ‘feeling of being important and gives him more bearing when he goes out into the world’ (Dr. Smith in Packard, 2007, p88); selling ego-gratification, the belief that you are better than other people by having the product as ‘being envied is a solitary form of reassurance’ (Berger, 1972, p133); selling creative outlets, encouraging the customer to add their own personal touch to the product; selling love objects, convincing the consumer that buying the product will attract an object of desire; selling sense of power, believing the product will increase your status in life; selling a sense of roots, appealing to family memories and home comforts as ‘publicity is, in essence, nostalgic. It has to sell the past to the future’ (Berger, 1972, p139); selling immortality, the need to be remembered and have influence during life and after death. By fulfilling these needs, this creates the illusion of happiness through consumption, which is a concept which Freud, Bernays and Packard all have in common.

These ideals are embodied in the Honda Civic -4-Door advert (Fig.1), depicting the inside of a man’s wallet with two images on either side of the wallet; one showing a wholesome image of children and the other showing the car in question. The placement of the car and children indicates the idea of emotional security by being able to drive the children places yourself in your own car. The connection between the car and the children indicates a reassurance of worth as his love for his children makes them worthy of being driven around in a new car. The tagline at the bottom of the advert reads ‘If anybody should ask, go ahead and show them your new pride and joy’. This boosts the ego-gratification of the purchase that by showing it off, you will be the envy of others and how proud you will be by having this car in your life. This advert doesn’t appeal to the selling of creative outlets as it doesn’t encourage the owner to put their own personal touch to the product but it does give the message that the car will become personal and integrate itself within the owner’s life. The idea of selling a love object is indirect within this advert but still remains as the image of the children indicates that this person has managed to find the love of their life and have a family while having this car, also tying in to the selling of power and the improvement of the owners status. The selling of roots is embodied within the advert with the presentation of the car as an amateur home photograph within someone’s wallet makes it seem as though it is part of the family. Through this aspect can the idea of immortality be sold as the car is depicted as an extension of the father figure as the car will be part of the children’s memory of their father during their child-hood.

This emotional approach to marketing by advertisers has change the way that people approach purchasing as it plays on the need to want something instead of buying something as a replacement. This change of the way society views itself has altered the way adverts target consumers as they manufacture desire, creating a false need.

A key aspect of modern consumerism is desire for admiration as public advertisements feed upon the dreams of the consumer, giving them a lifestyle to strive for. The advert makes the audience dissatisfied with their way of life. Advertising proposes how the product can create small changes to your life, enriching it and bringing you closer to the dream and offering an alternative to reality. By offering this image to the buyer, they imagine how others will perceive them, with Berger stating that ‘it’s promise is not of pleasure, but of happiness: happiness as judged from the outside by others. The happiness of others is being envied is glamour’ (Berger, 1972, p132). Publicity is based upon the selfishness of wanting people to envy you and by being valued in this way makes us happy so by buying the product, it justifies the ability to love yourself. Having other people envy you holds the impression of being powerful and having control over others. This creates an adverse effect on our society as this creates an anxiety as to the need of purchases, as by ‘having nothing, you will be nothing’ (Berger, 1972, p143) so to fit in with the rest of the world, we need to keep buying. This anxiety of acceptance goes towards the portrayal of women and the desire to look like a socially prescribed ideal due to advertisements has become part of this culture of admiration. Women are described as ‘more narciassistic’ (Freud, in Coward, 2000, p36) in regards to the physical presentation and this is reflected in how the key to getting further in life is pinpointed on how ‘visual impressions have been elevated to the position of holding the key to our psychic well-being, our social success, and indeed to whether or not we will be loved’ (Coward, 2000, p34). A lot of important things in life are based on how you look so this desire is then targeted in marketing, which links with the main points made by Packard and Bernays.

The desire for admiration is shown in the advertisement for SHARP’s Aquos TV series (Fig 2). The advert shows a well-known public figure stood open-mouthed in shock at a wide-screen television. The television itself is stood on a plinth, making the television taller than the celebrity, and appearing as though it is trying to intimidate with its size, making a display of its power status. The rest of the advert is displayed in white whilst the television screen is swathed in colour drawing the eye of the consumer to the screen as it is trying to show how it is better than any other on the market. This display of dominance is reflected in the use of celebrity as it gives the impression to the audience that this is a television that is good enough for the rich and famous so it can make them just as good. The reaction displayed by the celebrity makes the buyer want to purchase it, as they want other people to react in this way. Berger points out that ‘publicity does not manufacture the dream. All that it does is to propose to each one of us that we are not enviable- yet could be’ (Berger, 1972, p149) and from the advert, being the cause of others jealously from purchasing the product making the owner feel powerful because they can afford a television like this so it becomes a symbol for their status in society.

The socially prescribed ideal of women is used to manipulate the sexual desire of humans but it can be used as a symbol for being more than just the physical. It has become the norm for women in adverts being depicted as objects of desire for men to sell products to the audience. It is believed by consumers that by buying this product, we can attract the person of our dreams. Not only are we consuming products to attract an object of desire but we are purchasing to show that we are desirable because we can afford to buy them. On the other hand, this presentation of women in advertising can create ‘an emphasis for girls and women is always on being desirable, not on experiencing desire’ (Kilbourne, 2000, p148) thereby causing a belief that women should realistically look like this and be the object of sexual gratification within the media, giving the wrong impression to male consumers. This is seconded by Freud who states that ‘’Beauty’ and ‘attractiveness are originally properties of the sexual object’ (Freud, 2004, p25).

This approach to sexual desire can be found in a lot of modern advertising. The Silk Cut cigarettes advertisements by Saatchi & Saatchi for Gallaher offer a range of adverts revolved around depicting visual interpretations of the brand name ‘silk cut’. This particular advert (Fig.3) shows a length of purple silk material with a small diagonal cut made into the material clearly connoting to female genitalia. Even though there isn’t a female within the advert, there is clear influence of Freudian theory as it taps into the subconscious of desire through the sexual imagery and sadistic impulses to harm but also the desire of self-destructiveness to buying objects that cause self-harm. The silk is very soft and feminine like the skin of a female and the use of the colour purple is royal and glamorous. The display and layout of the information would create the subconscious implication of sexual desire in a voyeuristic manner, creating a positive link between the buyer and the brand. Another example of overt sexualisation within advertising is the Dolce and Gabbana advertisement for Esquire magazine (Fig 4), which depicts a group of males watching and surrounding a lone female who is pinned to the floor in a sexual position by another male. The male’s physically overpowering stance over the female emphasizes the explicit desire for power and control and this is mirrored by the women’s gaze looking away from the man adding to the fantasy as ‘In this society, looking has become a crucial aspect of sexual relations not because of any natural impulse, but because it is one of the ways in which domination and subordination are expressed’ (Coward, 2000, p34). This gives the impression to the consumer that by buying the product, you are one step closer to achieving and living out your fantasy.

With both of these adverts looking at sexual desire, Coward, Packard and Kilbourne all comment on the perception of women and sexual desire within advertising. Erving Goffman points out in Kilbourne that ‘we learn a great deal about the disparate power of males and females simply through the body language and poses of advertising. Women, especially young women, are generally subservient to men in ads, through both size and position’ (Goffman in Kilbourne, 2000, p141) highlighting the use of proposed imagery to make the need for sex heightened whilst making women seem weak and feeble against men. In Packard’s The Hidden Persuaders, a psychologist argues that women themselves would like to fulfill the desire of being semi-naked with a large audience watching as it ‘represents a beautiful example of wishful fulfillment’. He argues that women are empowered by being portrayed as a sexual desire for consumerism as the want ‘is present in most of us’ (Uncredited in Packard, 2007, p96). Despite this, Coward points out that ‘beauty, like truth, is one of those empty terms, filled by the values of a particular society at a given historical moment’ (Coward, 2000, p35) highlighting how the sexual desires of society are dictated by what is classed as beauty within advertising circles. The women they choose whose image accompanies the product becomes a desire object and an object of sexual desire, and ultimately selling the product. This brings in the argument of the ethics of using sexual gratification within consumerism to promote and sell more products. What all of these comments do show is how advertising comments on the culture and society at the time, highlighting the society of vanity we have become where we have lost the ability to be happy from what we have naturally and need to enhance what we have to please.

What advertising has ‘achieved by imposing a false standard of what is and what is not desirable’ (Berger, 1972, p154) through the use of psychoanalysis is not just selling a product but it has managed to ‘sell whole new ways of behaving’ (Tye, 2002, p52) by ‘by studying our subconscious needs, yearnings, and cravings’ (Packard, (2007) p86) through the use of systematically targeting the ultimate need of everyday people as it sells ‘a great deal more than products. It sells values, images and concepts of love’ (Kilbourne, 2000, p74). Through a magnitude of other desires, it target the basic human emotion of wanting to be loved because if we do not buy these products, ‘unless we measure up, we will not be loved’ (Coward, 2000, p38) and that is that fear which scares us into buying the most, therefore creating a ‘redefinition of needs’ (Marcuse , 1991, p245). Freud, Bernays and Berger all have this in common as they comment on the need to be loved and its connection to our instinctual wants.  Bernays gives an example of how people desire objects ‘because he has unconsciously come to see it as a symbol of something else’ (Bernays, 2005, p75) and one of the reasons for the purchase as ‘ a means of pleasing his wife’ (Bernays, 2005, p75) highlighting the desire for a product through the acceptance and love for another. Berger takes the ideal and turns it on its head by commenting on how the consumer ‘is transformed by the product into an object of envy for others, an envy which will then justify her loving herself’ (Berger, 1972, p134) highlighting how the need to be loved doesn’t just stem from the need to be loved by others but the need to love ourselves. However, philosopher Jean Baudrillard contradicts this, arguing that ‘there are no given, essential or real needs for humans and that the distinction between ‘true’ and ‘false’ need is impossible to sustain’ (Baudrillard, in Lury, 2003, p68) thereby stating how humans have neither true or false desires so there cannot be any direct correlation between advertising and purchasing. However, Freud argues against this stating that ‘the way that life places love at the center of everything and expects all satisfaction to come from loving and being loved’  (Freud, 2004, p24) highlighting how desire to be loved exists, is what we work for and work towards fulfilling. Overall, the social message of our culture is ‘if you are able to buy this product you will be loveable. If you cannot buy it, you will be less loveable’ (Berger, 1972, p144) therefore we use products as to ‘constitute a guarantee of emotional support’ (Lane Benson, 2004, p159). 

Due to the cycle of consuming for happiness, we are becoming disillusioned, as fantasies do not become a reality. I believe that ‘no other kind of hope or satisfaction or pleasure can any longer be envisaged within the culture of capitalism’ (Berger, 1972, p153). This emotional connection has spurred a generation of consumers who feel the need to feed their self-worth through purchases. This has produced a culture, which now sees the want to buy as normality rather than purchasing for necessity. Bernays stated in his book, Propaganda that ‘We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world’ (Bernays, 2005, p17) This manipulation has changed our way of life as we have become a world of compulsive buyers who have materialistic values, generating ‘negative consequences to building a sense of self that is externally manifest, because the inner core self is likely to feel more and more empty and vulnerable as this process continues over a lifetime.’ (Lane Benson, 2004, p95). By becoming this, the future looks bleak so consumerism is a concept that ‘we must try at last to understand, if we want to change the world that Edward Bernays, among others, made for us’ (Crispin Miller in Bernays, 2005 , p30) and that ‘genuine freedom and well-being depend on liberation from the entire system of one-dimensional needs and satisfactions’ (Marcuse, 1991, pxxxi).

Word Count: 3267

Bibliography:
  1. Berger, J. (1972) ‘Ways Of Seeing’ 1st ed., London: British Broadcasting Corporation- p 132, 133, 134, 139, 143, 144, 149, 153, 154
  2. Bernays, E. (2005) “Propaganda” 2nd ed., New York: Ig Publishing- p17, 30, 39, 75
  3. Coward, R. ‘The Look’, in Thomas, J. (ed) (2000), ‘Reading Images’, Basingstoke: Palgrave- p 34, 35, 36, 38
  4.  Freud, S. (2004) ‘Civilization And Its Discontents’, 2nd ed., London: Penguin Books - p14, 16, 17, 24
  5. Kilbourne, J (2000) ‘Can’t Buy My Love’ 1st ed., New York: Touchstone- p33, 74, 141, 148
  6. Lane Benson, A. (2004) “I Shop Therefore I Am”, 2nd ed., USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.- p95, 159
  7.  Lury, C. (2003) “Consumer Culture” 2nd, ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd- p68 
  8. Marcuse, H. (1991) “ One- Dimensional Man”, 2nd ed., London: Routledge- pxxxi, 245 
  9. Packard, V. (2007) ‘The Hidden Persuaders’ 2nd ed., New York: Ig Publishing- p86- 94, 96
  10. Tye, L. (2002) ‘The Father Of Spin’, 2nd ed., New York: Holt Paperbacks- p viii, 9, 52, 97 
Images:

Fig. 1: Honda Civic-4-Door Advert
Kilbourne, J (2000) ‘Can’t Buy My Love’ 1st ed., New York: Touchstone- p33


Fig. 2: SHARP’s ‘Aquos TV series’ Advertisement
James Webby (2010) ‘Evaluation of 2 adverts” [Weblog] 28th September Available from http://jameswebbymediastudies.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/evaluation-of-two-adverts.html (Accessed 4th January 2014)

Fig 3: Silk Cut Cigarettes Advertisements (1983) by Saatchi & Saatchi
McIntosh, A. (2000) ‘Gallagher Silk Cut Cigarettes Adverts” [Internet] Available from http://www.alastairmcintosh.com/images/silkcut.htm (Accessed 4th January 2014)


Fig 4: Dolce & Gabbana Advert for Esquire Magazine


Green, D. (2013) ‘15 Recent Ads that Glorify Sexual Violence Against Women” [Internet] Available from http://www.businessinsider.com/sex-violence-against-women-ads-2013-5#wrong-dolce-and-gabbana-consistently-tries-to-market-itself-as-an-edgy-brand-this-ad-ran-in-esquire-the-company-retracted-it-after-people-complained-that-it-glamorized-gang-rape-2 (Accessed 4th January 2014)

Sunday, 5 May 2013

Context of Practice: 3,000 Word Modernism Essay Completed

Focusing of specific examples, describe the way that art and design was a response to the forces of modernity
“Modernity is the transient, the fleeting, the contingent; it is one half of art, the other being the eternal and the immovable”
- (Baudelaire in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p107)

As defined by Baudelaire, modernity’s goal is to create an improved quality of lifestyle. Naturally, art and design responded to this effect. This essay will cover how modernity impacted on the way we approach art and design, how they responded and how it’s influenced art and design today.
This begs the question, ‘What is modernism?’ Malcolm Barnard attempts to shed light on this in his book “ Graphic Design As Communication” in the sixth chapter ‘Modernism’. He discusses the four key features of modernism as defined by Boyne and Rattansi (1990).  These features are; aesthetic self-reflexiveness, when an object is made out of itself or the medium draws attention to itself, reflected in the designers work; montage, the putting together or superimposing of unrelated objects to produce something new, where ‘both temporal sequence and representational images may be disrupted’ (Barnard (2005) p116); paradox, ambiguity and uncertainty, alluding to their being no clear, single message or having multiple meanings; loss of the integrated individual subject, a lack of unity, consistency or harmony to the object or the feeling of loosing a sense of self. Elementary to modernism is optimism, believing in progress to improve the future. Barnard uses ‘TINTE’ (1924) by El Lissitzsky (Fig 1) as an example in chapter 6. It embodies aesthetic self- reflection as the aesthetic quality lends itself to the advertised ink product and draws attention to the medium, allowing the audience to ‘see’ the process. There is no montage as it is fluid and consistent in one medium, however, the stencilled typeface for the word ‘TINTE’ appears superimposed and put onto the bottle without consideration of placement. Despite this, it doesn’t create something new so there is no defined element of montage. Paradox, ambiguity and uncertainty haven’t been fulfilled, as the poster’s single message of promoting the product is clear and distinctive. ‘TINTE’ has a feeling of losing it’s sense of self as Lissitzsky has blurred the side of the image, losing it’s physical being towards the end, yet, it’s unity, consistency and meaning within the medium and message presentation doesn’t lose the integrated individual subject. Optimism in progress is prevalent in Lissitzsky’s work and ‘TINTE’ is no exception. Lissitzsky has created a campaign that intends to improve the lives of others by advertising the tools to aid communication amongst the masses, encouraging the development of future communications. Ultimately, this proves that modernist works needn’t have all aspects of these features; they can just have resemblances and still be modernist due to the intention and beliefs behind it. Boyne and Rattansi commented that ‘Modernism is a critique of Modernity ‘ (Boyne & Rattansi in Barnard, M. (2005), p113) reacting to seeing areas of dissatisfactory life, finding ways to improve and highlighting the subjective experience of modernism by individualistic responses by artists and designers.

This design approach was from modernity’s impact on our lives. It saw society develop and accept change, leading to progression into several areas of living. Communications broke barriers between countries, aiding the discovery of new technologies as word of mouth spread the inventions that eased the quality of living. Transport systems encouraged mobility and curiosity of surrounding cultures. The Printing Press contributed to the expansion of mass production. People learnt how to read and write, as publications would spread the word across the Globe. Industrialization saw people leaving the countryside and travel to the city for shift work, leading to a sharp increase into the urbanisation of the city. These drastic changes saw people’s attitudes develop, wanting a glamorous and fast-paced modern lifestyle, compared to the previously laid back and traditional lifestyle. Luxuries, like fine clothing and jewellery, became a status symbol and the introduction of leisure time saw people wanting to be entertained for their pleasure. Charles Baudelaire who, in his ‘The Painter of Modern Life’ (1859-60) recorded these changes ‘He gazes at the landscape of the great city, landscapes of stone now swathed in the mist, now struck in full face by the sun. He enjoys handsome equipages, proud horses, the spit and polish of the grooms, the skilful handling by the page boys, the smooth rhythmic gait of the woman, the beauty of the children, full of the joy of life and proud as peacocks of their pretty clothes; in short, life universal. If in a shift of fashion, the cut of the dress has been slightly modified, if clusters of ribbons and curls have been dethroned by rosettes, of bonnets have widened and chignons have come down a little on the nape of the neck, if waist-lines have been raised and skirts become fuller, you may be sure that from a long way off his eagle’s eye will have detected it’ (Baudelaire in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p105-106). Baudelaire’s observations on displayed status reflect a growing commodity culture. His comments account for changes to architecture and fashion, reinforcing the need for progress and improvement.

Modernity had repercussions into the effect it had on our culture and ways of living thus having a knock on effect on our approach to art and design.

The introduction of the “Form Follows Function” philosophy, introduced by architect Louis Sullivan’s (1896) law formulation is still relevant today. A products purpose is of more importance than the aesthetic appearance of the object. The appearance is determined solely by the products function. Laszlo Moholy-Nagy in his ‘The New Typography’ essay said ‘the new beauty is not a style that matches one object with another aesthetically by using similar external forms (façade, motif, ornament). Today, something is beautiful if its form serves its function’ (Moholy- Nagy in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p303). The prospect of decoration made the design seem insincere and ornamentation was dysfunctional or over-the-top in extravagance. Adolf Loos stated in his 1908 ‘Ornament And Crime’ essay ‘I have discovered the following truth and present it to the world: cultural evolution is equivalent to the removal of ornament from articles in daily use’ (Loos in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p78). Society can’t move forward without realising that decoration is a distraction from what is really important in life. Massimo Vignelli in his ‘Long Live Modernism!’ article (1991) backs this up ‘Modernism’s ascetic, Spartan look still has a towering position of strength and dignity. Modernism’s inherent notion of timeless values as opposed to transient values still greatly appeals to my intellectual being’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p 52). From these writings, it highlights that modernism doesn’t look to the past but to the future for inspiration, to be forward thinking and invent new styles.

 Le Corbusier features ‘Form Follows Function’ within his architecture. His designs aimed to be progressive and aid the development of society. He noted ‘Once the full story is known, it becomes clear that everything has a time and a place and that nothing of the past is of use to us. For our life on this world is a path on which we can never retrace our steps’ (Le Corbusier in Greenhalgh, P (2005), p113). Stating that you can’t look to the past for inspiration as it has had its time, the only way to move forward and advance is to progress. He approached architecture, as undecorated and undisguised as objectifying his designs would detract from the beauty that was hidden beneath. Beauty came from an object doing what it was built to do and being functional. These beliefs are upheld in “Villa Savoye” (Fig 2.) as an ‘architectural vision was powerfully evolutionist. He saw the cityscape as a tool for the advancement of civilisation’ (Greenhalgh, P. (2005), p223). The reinforced concrete highlights development in technologies, with the pilotis poles holding the structure upright. The white colour emphasizes the lack of decoration providing an aura of simplicity to the domain. With windows as walls and a garden area on the roof, the house is environmentally friendly as it brings in natural light so as not to disturb the surrounding area. With this consideration, Le Corbusier designed a language of design that could be understood on an international basis, described as  ‘a rational simplification of architecture’ (Meecham, P & Sheldon, J. (2005), p140).

Next came the birth of the Bauhaus school, which had an influx of designers who were given a modernist education. Walter Groupius, founder of The Bauhaus, printed a ‘Manifesto of the Bauhaus’ in 1919 declaring the intentions of the building ‘the conscious co-operation and collaboration of all craftsmen’ (Groupius in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998) p301). The philosophy was to work together as a unit to produce a better future for the world. In Malcolm Barnard’s “ Graphic Design As Communication” book in the sixth chapter ‘Modernism’, P.B. Meggs said that the Bauhaus was ‘intensely visionary’ and ‘utopian’ in its first five years (Meggs in Barnard, M. (2005), p124). Important ideals included that products were respectful and true to their material or original state. Design that could be universal in understanding and purpose, to aid unity of the global community, was integral. The Bauhaus insisted on “all forms of art and design were to contribute to the improvement of humanity and society” (Barnard, M. (2005), p124).

In Bernard’s ‘Modernism’ chapter, he describes the development of sans serif typography that was produced in the Bauhaus, “the Bauhaus typographers wanted to rationalise the alphabet, to prefect the letter forms and to clarify communications” (Bernard, (2005), p135). In 1925, Moholy-Nagy complained ‘we do not even possess a type-face that is correct in size, is clearly legible and lacking in any individual features and that is based on a functional form of visual appearance without distortions and curlicues’ (Mohony- Nagy in Jobling, P. & Crowley, D (1996), p140). In Bernard’s ‘Modernism’ chapter, he describes the Modernist development of sans serif typography that was produced in the Bauhaus, using Herbert Bayer’s ‘Universal’ (1926) typeface as an example (Fig.3). In 1925, Moholy-Nagy complained ‘we do not even possess a type-face that is correct in size, is clearly legible and lacking in any individual features and that is based on a functional form of visual appearance without distortions and curlicues’ (Mohony- Nagy in Jobling, P. & Crowley, D (1996), p140). A typographic proposal for this was ‘Universal’. It contained solely lower-case letters and no capitals in the typeface. In Bayer’s ‘Towards A Universal Typeface’ 1935 essay, he explains the two areas of reasoning for his design choices, social context and aesthetic development. Bayer accounts the modernist culture as “today we do not build Gothic buildings travelling on horseback or wear crinolines; we construct ‘contemporary buildings’, travel in cars and planes and dress more traditionally” (Bayer in Bernard (2005), p125) thereby demonstrating the context behind the typefaces creation. Due to cultural development, roman typefaces were seen as old-fashioned and out-dated as they were created with chisel and stone, the medium at the time. This gives them the appearance of having a mixture of thick and thin strokes with serifs. Bayer’s aesthetic development of straight lines, geometric circles and constant line thicknesses meant “there was no need for typefaces to retain serifs or thick and thin lines” (Bernard, (2005), p125) as it is more suited to contemporary mechanical reproduction. Socially, the lowercase type was to aid people learning to read and write as it would be “less of a burden” to not read capitals (Bayer in Bernard, (2005), p125).  Richard Hollis’ Graphic Design: A Concise History’ book states ‘in restricting ourselves to lower-case letters our type loses nothing, but becomes more easily read, more easily learned, substantially economic’ (Hollis, R. (2001), p54). ‘Universal’ was to be used globally as a way to ‘save labour, time and money and to improve communication’ (Kinross in Bernard, (2005), p126) between people on a worldwide scale. Jeremy Anynsley stated ‘Bayer argued that this saved space and money because printers needed to stock only one range of the typefaces, and also it enhanced international communication’ (Anynsley, J. (2004), p66). As shown by Bernard, Bayer reflected these stresses by adopting a lowercase style to combat them, even though they were never used or “went into production” (Bernard, (2005), p127). Bayer highlighted how “the Bauhaus conceives modernism a as social, or even a socialist, project. It thus shares the ambivalence towards the values of the modern world that was noted above as one of the four key features of modernism and wants to eradicate inefficient communication in the interests of improving the world” (Bernard, (2005), p126) which is reflected in the Bauhaus’ support of ‘Universal’, so much so it was used as the signage for the Bauhaus building (Fig 4.). Despite this, Bayer, in a letter to Jan Tschichold contradicted his typefaces intentions ‘I can only wish that typography be carried out and perceived with less ideology, and instead with rather more graphic sense’ (Bayer in Burke, C (2007), p132). Jobling & Crowley suggest that Bayer had described lowercase letters as ‘phonetically redundant’ (Jobling, P. & Crowley, D. (2006), p141) indicating that Bayer put more thought into the aesthetics, geometric shapes and line thicknesses rather than the fonts use.  If comparing ‘Universal’ alongside the modernist features Bernard laid out in chapter six, it holds no single message and therefore no uncertainty, it was not created from unrelated superimposed objects so it has no montage and it has complete unity therefore having no loss of the integrated individual subject. Bernard states ‘There is little sense of Bayer’s typefaces, for example, self reflexively drawing attention to the constructed nature of the typefaces” (Bernard, (2005), p134) demonstrating the lack of aesthetic self-reflexivity. From this, it leaves optimism, which ‘Universal’ fully satisfies based on Bayer’s want to use ‘Universal’ to progress communication for the future. In chapter six, Bernard concludes that modernist typography “are undecorated, economical, easy to read and therefore in harmony with modern times. Sans serif faces are also modernist in the terms progressive and liberal” and are “opposed nationalism and exclusivity” based on their global connectivity yet he also argues “neither Tschichold nor Bayer is modernist in the sense that modernism places a high value on the use of ambiguity and ambivalence: these qualities are precisely what the Bauhaus’s graphic design… were intended to avoid” (Bernard, (2005), p127-128). This goes back to the fact that even though something doesn’t have all modernist qualities, it can have “family resemblances” (Wittgenstein in Bernard (2005), p134), which still makes it modernist, as demonstrated with ‘Universal’.

Bayer, alongside Jan Tschichold, went on to influence the design collective called the ‘International Typographic Style’. Developing a quintessential modernist style, they followed strict rules about the aesthetic that they desired, finding a way to develop a sense of internationalism. The use of a rigid grid structure, aligned to be flush left and ragged right, with the use of chosen Modernist typeface, Aksidenz Grotesk, became their signature visual presentation. Their approach to design was to have a logical layout with minimal colour, stripped of all decoration. The most recognised design by International Typographic Style was the publication of ‘Neue Grafik’ Journal (Fig 5). This journal was to coincide with the development of communication, allowing Europe to spread its ideology to a larger audience, providing a ‘an international platform for the discussion of modern graphic and applied art’ according to Jeremy Anysley (Aynsley, J. (2004), p 123). ‘Neue Grafik’ was printed in the main three languages at the time, English, German and French, expanding the readership just by catering for the global audience.  There was no decoration in the layout presentation and the typeface was sans serif to co-ordinate with the lack of ornamentation. The information within the publication was direct and to the point, kept in rigid columns so as to inform the reader of the magazine’s contents, described as ‘its own design constantly epitomizing its outlook’ (Aynsley, J. (2004), p122). Bayer’s influence can be seen in the choice of using a system ‘which included the use of simple type forms because they were universal, clear and impersonal’ as well as how “each of them is serving international and ‘universal’ communication in a way that is quite in keeping with the progressive and socially improving values of modernism” (Bernard, (2005), p128) which reflect the reasoning behind his development of the ‘Universal’ typeface and upholds his beliefs behind his designs.

Art and design reflects the world around us, acting as documentation to record the development of society and how we have changed. It contributed to the modernism movement itself that further progressed and accelerated the change in culture. Art and design responded by aiding the development of emerging experimentation and technologies, pushing the boundaries and attempting to connect the world community, steering mass culture towards the principles of rationalism and functionality. Massimo Vignelli stated that ‘Modernism was and still is the search for truth, the search for integrity, the search for cultural stimulation and enrichment of the mind. Modernism was never a style but an attitude… from the beginning, Modernism had the urgency of utopianism: to make as world better by design.’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p 51) Others opposed this, even Adolf Hitler in his ‘Great Exhibition of Modern Art’ inaugurating speech ‘it is the expression of a certain vintage which is characterised today by the word ‘modern’, and thus, of course, will be un-modern tomorrow, since it will be out-dated’ (Hitler in Kolocotroni, V. et al (2005), p561). Art and design responded to the forces of modernity, working to achieve a global method of communicative understanding which we are still feeling the repercussions of today. Robert Hughes commented ‘The modernist achievement will continue to affect culture for decades to come, because it was so large, so imposing, and so irrefutably convincing’ (Hughes, R in Bocola, S. (1999), p569). Even though modernism developed as an era between the late 19th and early 20th century, we have kept the integral ideals and upheld the beliefs that were brand new centuries ago. As Vignelli demanded, ‘Long Live the Modern movement!’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p52).

Word Count: 3,040

Bibliography:
1.     Aynsley, J (2004) ‘Pioneers of Modern Graphic Design: A Complete History’ 2nd ed., London: Octopus Publishing Group Ltd –p66, p122-123

2.     Barnard, M (2005) ‘Graphic Design As Communication’ 1st ed., Oxon: Routledge –p112-113, p114, p116, p124, p125, p126, p127, 128, p134, p135

3.     Bierut, M.  Drenttel, W. Heller, S. & Holland, D. K. (1994) ‘Looking Closer- Critical Writings on Graphic Design’ Allworth Press- p51-52

4.     Bocola, S (1999) ‘The Art Of Modernism: Art, Culture and Society from Goya to the Present Day’ 1st ed., Munich: Prestel Verlag- p569

5.     Burke, C. (2007) ‘Active Literature: Jan Tschichold and New Typography’, 1 ed., London: Hyphen Press- p132

6.     Greenhalgh, P. (2005) ‘The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism’ 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p113, p223

7.     Hollis, R. (2001) ‘Graphic Design: A Concise History’ 2nd ed., London: Thames & Hudson- p54

8.     Kolocotroni, V. Goldman, J. & Taxidou, O. (1998) ‘Modernism: An Anthology of Sources and Documents’ 1st ed., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press- p77, p105-p107, p301, p303, p561

9.     Jobling, P. & Crowley, D. (1996) ‘Graphic Design: Reproduction & Representation Since 1800’ 1 ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press- p140, p141

10.  Meecham, P. & Sheldon, J. (2005) ‘Modern Art: A Critical Introduction’ 2nd ed., Oxon: Routledge- p140

Image Sources: 

(Fig 1.) ‘TINTE’ (1924) by El Lissitzsky
Barnard, M (2005) ‘Graphic Design As Communication’ 1st ed., Oxon: Routledge –p116
(Fig 2.) “Villa Savoye” (1928) by Le Corbusier
Greenhalgh, P. (2005) “ The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism” 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p225 
(Fig 3.) “Universe” (1926) by Herbert Bayer
Aynsley, J (2004) “Pioneers of Modern Graphic Design: A Complete History” 2nd ed., London: Octopus Publishing Group Ltd –p62
(Fig 4.)  “The Bauhaus” (1925) by Walter Groupius
Greenhalgh, P. (2005) “ The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism” 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p167
(Fig 5.)"Neue Grafik Magazine" (1958- 1965) by LMNV
 Magazine Archive (2011) "Neue Grafik Magazine" [Internet] Available from http://magazinearchive.co/portfolio/neue-grafik-magazine (Accessed 23rd October 2012) 

Monday, 28 January 2013

Context of Practise: 3,000 Word Modernism Essay- First Draft

Focusing of Specific examples, describe the way that Art and Design was a response to the Forces of Modernity
“Modernity is the transient, the fleeting, the contingent; it is one half of art, the other being the eternal and the immovable”
- (Baudelaire in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p107)
As defined by Baudelaire, the goal of Modernity is to create an improved quality of lifestyle. Art and Design began the natural reaction of responding to this effect. This essay will cover specific aspects of how the forces of Modernity impacted on the way we approach Art and Design, how Art and Design responded and how it’s influenced Art and Design today.

This begs the question, ‘What is Modernism?’ Modernism is difficult to define yet Malcolm Barnard attempts to shed light on this in his book “ Graphic Design As Communication” in the sixth chapter ‘Modernism’. He discusses the 4 key features of Modernism works that were defined by Boyne and Rattansi (1990).  These features are; Aesthetic Self-Reflexiveness, which is when an object is made out of itself or the medium draws attention to itself which is thus reflected in the work by the designer; Montage, which is the putting together or superimposing of unrelated objects to produce something new, where ‘both temporal sequence and representational images may be disrupted’ (Barnard (2005) p116); Paradox, Ambiguity and Uncertainty which alludes to the ideal of their being no clear, single message or the essence of having multiple meanings; Loss of the Integrated Individual Subject which gives a lack of unity, consistency or harmony to the object or the feeling of loosing a sense of self. Another aspect that is elementary to Modernism is Optimism in the belief in Progress as it has conviction in its approach to, ultimately, improve the future that we will end up having. An example used within Chapter 6 by Barnard to show aspects of these Modernist elements is ‘TINTE’ (1924) by El Lissitzsky (Fig 1). It embodies the reference to Aesthetic Self- Reflection based on the aesthetic quality of the poster lending itself to the ink product that it is showcasing. This draws attention to the medium, which advertises the product effectively, particularly as the process that was used to create the poster can be ‘seen’ by the audience. Predominantly, there is no element of Montage in this image as it is fluid and consistent using one medium, however, the stencilled typeface used for the word ‘TINTE’ seems like it has been superimposed and put onto the bottle without consideration of placement. Despite this, it doesn’t create something new so there is no defined element of Montage. The area of Paradox, Ambiguity and Uncertainty hasn’t been fulfilled as the poster has a single message of promoting the product, which is clear and distinctive. In a sense, ‘TINTE’ has a feeling of loosing it’s sense of self as Lissitzsky has blurred the side of the image, meaning it looses it’s physical being towards the end, yet, it holds it’s unity, consistency ands meaning within the medium and message presentation thereby not having lost the Integrated Individual Subject. Finally, optimism in progress is prevalent in Lissitzsky’s work and ‘TINTE’ is no exception. Lissitzsky has created a campaign that intends to improve the lives of others by advertising the tools to aid communication amongst the masses, therefore encouraging the development of communications in the future. Ultimately, what this proves is that It isn’t necessary for a piece of Modernism to have all aspects of these features; they can just have resemblances and still be Modernist due to the intention and beliefs behind it. Boyne and Rattansi commented that ‘Modernism is a critique of Modernity ‘ (Boyne & Rattansi in Barnard, M. (2005), p113) in reacting to seeing areas of dissatisfactory life, finding ways of making improvements to it and highlighting the subjective experience of Modernism by individualistic responses by Artists and Designers.

This approach to design was from the impact that Modernity had on our lives. It saw a development in the way society accepted change, leading to progression into several areas of living. Communications broke barriers between countries as people became inquisitive to the surrounding cultures. Introducing rapid transport systems began to encourage people’s mobility. This new ability to communicate amongst countries soon aided the discovery of new technologies as word of mouth spread the inventions that came to ease the quality of living. One of these new technologies, The Printing Press, contributed to the expansion of mass production. People learnt how to read and write, reinforcing the necessity of communication as publications would spread the word across the Globe. Industrialization saw people beginning to leave the countryside and travel to the city for shift work. This led to people moving homes and a sharp increase into the urbanisation of the city. All of these drastic changes saw a development into the attitudes of people, who want a piece of the glamour and fast-paced modern lifestyle experience, compared to their previously laid back and traditional lifestyle choices.  These changes came in the shape of luxuries, like fine clothing and jewellery, becoming a status symbol and the introduction of leisure time as people wanted to be entertained for their pleasure out of work hours. These integral changes to the society at the time were recorded by Charles Baudelaire who, in his ‘The Painter of Modern Life’ (1859-60) wrote ‘He gazes at the landscape of the great city, landscapes of stone now swathed in the mist, now struck in full face by the sun. He enjoys handsome equipages, proud horses, the spit and polish of the grooms, the skilful handling by the page boys, the smooth rhythmic gait of the woman, the beauty of the children, full of the joy of life and proud as peacocks of their pretty clothes; in short, life universal. If in a shift of fashion, the cut of the dress has been slightly modified, if clusters of ribbons and curls have been dethroned by rosettes, of bonnets have widened and chignons have come down a little on the nape of the neck, if waist-lines have been raised and skirts become fuller, you may be sure that from a long way off his eagle’s eye will have detected it’ (Baudelaire in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p105-106). Baudelaire’s comments emphasize the commodity culture that has developed from the growing need to display their status. His observations give a detailed account on how the time changed in regards to architecture and fashion, reinforcing the need they felt to progress and improve.

These forces of Modernity had repercussions into the effect it had on our culture and way of living. This had a knock on effect on our approach to Art and Design.

An area of specific importance was the introduction of the “Form Follows Function” philosophy, introduced by Architect Louis Sullivan’s (1896) law formulation, which is still relevant to our approach to design even today. This is the concept that a products purpose is of more importance than the aesthetic appearance to the object. The appearance is determined solely by the products function. This is described by Laszlo Moholy-Nagy in his ‘The New Typography’ essay as ‘the new beauty is not a style that matches one object with another aesthetically by using similar external forms (façade, motif, ornament). Today, something is beautiful if its form serves its function’ (Moholy- Nagy in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p303). The prospect of having any decoration made the design appear insincere. Additional ornamentation gave the impression of the design being dysfunctional or over-the-top in its decadent extravagance. Adolf Loos started in his 1908 ‘Ornament And Crime’ essay that ‘I have discovered the following truth and present it to the world: cultural evolution is equivalent to the removal of ornament from articles in daily use’ (Loos in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998), p78). He is emphasizing that society couldn’t move forward without first having realised that decoration gives nothing to them but a distraction from what is really important in life. Massimo Vignelli in his ‘Long Live Modernism!’ article (1991) backs up this ideal which says ‘Modernism’s ascetic, Spartan look still has a towering position of strength and dignity. Modernism’s inherent notion of timeless values as opposed to transient values still greatly appeals to my intellectual being’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p 52). Expressing the importance of the lack of ornamentation as it gives a timeless appearance to a piece of design, which will never seem out-dated due to this style choice. From these writings, it highlights that the philosophy aesthetically makes for a classic, dynamic piece of design, as Modernism doesn’t look to the past but to the future. This is to be forward thinking and invent new styles. The ‘Enlightenment Project’ who began to turn away from the religious teachings of the time, focusing their findings on using their own rationality and reason, took this on board. This secularisation meant that usefulness was the key priority of the group.

An example of the ‘Form Follows Function’ belief is within the architecture and furniture of designer Le Corbusier. He produced designs that aimed to be progressive and aid the development of society, noted in this quote on the topic of museums, ‘Once the full story is known, it becomes clear that everything has a time and a place and that nothing of the past is of use to us. For our life on this world is a path on which we can never retrace our steps’ (Le Corbusier in Greenhalgh, P (2005), p113). He is stating that you can’t look to the past for inspiration and room to develop as it has had its time. The only way to move forward and advance is to progress.  He approached architecture with the impression that it had to be undecorated and undisguised. He felt that objectifying his designs would detract from the beauty that was hidden beneath. He felt that beauty came from an object doing what it was built to do and being functional. These beliefs can be clearly seen in his architecture, such as “Villa Savoye” (Fig 2.) which Greenhalgh highlights that Le Corbusier’s ‘architectural vision was powerfully evolutionist. He saw the cityscape as a tool for the advancement of civilisation’ (Greenhalgh, P. (2005), p223). The reinforced concrete media reinforces the development in technologies and materials, with the pilotis poles holding the structure upright. The choice of white surrounding the house emphasizes the lack of decoration as the white provides an aura of simplicity to the domain.  The house is designed with windows as walls and a garden area on the roof which gives the additional function of the house being environmentally friendly as it brings in natural light so as not to disturb the surrounding area. With these factors taken into consideration, Le Corbusier designed a language of design that could be understood on an international basis. Meecham and Sheldon describing the style as ‘a rational simplification of architecture’ (Meecham, P & Sheldon, J. (2005), p140).

A large amount of the responses made by Art and Design world were heavily influenced by the birth of The Bauhaus School and the influx of designers who were given a Modernist education there. Walter Groupius, founder of The Bauhaus, printed a ‘Manifesto of the Bauhaus’ in 1919 where the intentions of the building were brought to light, such as ‘the conscious co-operation and collaboration of all craftsmen’ (Groupius in Kolocotroni, V. et al, (1998) p301). This highlights the philosophy of working together as a unit to produce a better future for the world. P.B. Meggs said that during the first 5 years of the Bauhaus’ existence, the Bauhaus was ‘intensely visionary’ and ‘utopian’ (Meggs in Barnard, M. (2005), p124). There were several ideals that were held at the Bauhaus which influenced the way that students produced work. It was important that products were respectful and true to their material or original state. The importance of producing design that could be universal in it’s understanding and purpose, to aid unity of the global community, was integral. There are plenty of examples of Modernist work that was produced in The Bauhaus, predominately the development of sans serif typography.
In 1925, Moholy-Nagy complained that ‘we do not even possess a type-face that is correct in size, is clearly legible and lacking in any individual features and that is based on a functional form of visual appearance without distortions and curlicues’ (Mohony- Nagy in Jobling, P. & Crowley, D (1996), p140). The development of the ‘Universal’ (1926) Typeface by Herbert Bayer (Fig 3.) was based on the social element of introducing a typeface with no Capital letters. The lowercase type was to aid educating people to learning to read and write, as explained by Richard Hollis’ Graphic Design: A Concise History’ book which stated that ‘in restricting ourselves to lower-case letters our type loses nothing, but becomes more easily read, more easily learned, substantially economic’ (Hollis, R. (2001), p54). He intended on providing a lower-case only typeface, which would save time and money by improving the communication between people. This is supported by Jeremy Anynsley who stated that ‘Bayer argued that this saved space and money because printers needed to stock only one range of the typefaces, and also it enhanced international communication’ (Anynsley, J. (2004), p66). It was also stressed that, due to the development of our culture, it was seen that the Roman typefaces were out-dated as they had been made by the media at the time, chisels on stone, so they were not representative of the smaller and sleeker medium at the time, pen and paper as well as the development of machines. In his ‘Towards A Universal Typeface’ (1935) Essay, Bayer described the changes that had happened in our culture, implying that the typefaces of today should represent the style of the times. The development of this font was supported by the Bauhaus as it was used as the signage for the Bauhaus building. (Fig 4.) However, this ideal is contradicted by Bayer himself in a letter to Jan Tschichold where he said ‘I can only wish that typography be carried out and perceived with less ideology, and instead with rather more graphic sense’ (Bayer in Burke, C (2007), p132). This indicates that Bayer put more thought and intention into the aesthetics, geometric shapes and line thicknesses of the font rather than the fonts use. This is supported by Jobling & Crowley suggesting that Bayer had described lowercase letters as ‘phonetically redundant’ (Jobling, P. & Crowley, D. (2006), p141).

This influence went on to develop the design collective called the ‘International Typographic Style’.  This group developed a quintessential modernist style, following strict rules about the aesthetic that they desired, to fit in with their beliefs of finding a way to develop a sense of Internationalism. The use of a rigid grid structure, aligned to be flush left and ragged right with the use of the chosen Modernist typeface, Aksidenz Grotesk was their signature presentation. Their approach to design was to have a logical layout with minimal colour, stripped of all decoration. The most recognised design by International Typographic Style was the publication of ‘Neue Grafik’ Journal (Fig 5). This journal was developed to coincide with the development of communication, allowing Europe to spread its ideology to a larger audience, providing a ‘an international platform for the discussion of modern graphic and applied art’ according to Jeremy Anysley (Aynsley, J. (2004), p 123). ‘Neue Grafik’ was Modernist as it was printed in the main three languages at the time, English, German and French, therefore expanding the readership just by catering for the global audience.  There was no decoration in the layout presentation and the typeface was sans serif to co-ordinate with the lack of ornamentation. The information within the publication was direct and to the point, kept in rigid columns so as to inform the reader of the magazine’s contents, described by Aynsley as ‘its own design constantly epitomizing its outlook’ (Aynsley, J. (2004), p122).

These responses, made by the reaction to Modernity at the time, have paved the way that we produce Art and Design today.  Designers and collectives, such as Experimental Jetset (Fig 6.), use minimalist decoration with a monochromatic colour palette and grid format to layout all the necessary information of their designs. Modernist design is reinforced by the strong use of the sans serif font, particularly with the increase in popularity gained from the recent global adoption of the typeface ‘Helvetica’ (Fig 7), arguably the quintessential modernist font, which, according to Simon Garfield ‘began to colonise the world’ (Garfield, S. (2011), p134), now used to brand countless companies.  Also, we now belong in a world that’s constantly updating and advancing with technologies and inventions. This means that we have now accommodated for Modernist design in the digital age. As described by Milton Glazer, ‘Modernism is about progress, the endless frontier and ceaseless development’; it’s ‘origins are in the idea of good coming from boundless technology’ (Glazer in Barnard, M (2005), p114). The technological designs of the company, Apple, highlight this with the birth of the iPod (Fig 8) reinventing the want for simplicity and sleek aesthetics combined with functional purpose. This has become extremely popular within the mainstream mass audience.

Overall, Art and Design reflects the world around us, acting as a method of documentation to record the development of our society and how we have changed. Whether directly or indirectly, it contributed to the Modernism movement itself, creating a style that further progressed and accelerated the change in culture. Art and Design responded by aiding the development of emerging experimentation and technologies, pushing the boundaries and attempting to connect the world community, steering mass culture towards the principles of rationalism and functionality. Massimo Vignelli stated that ‘Modernism was and still is the search for truth, the search for integrity, the search for cultural stimulation and enrichment of the mind. Modernism was never a style but an attitude… from the beginning, Modernism had the urgency of utopianism: to make as world better by design.’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p 51) This was opposed by others, even Adolf Hitler who stated in his ‘Great Exhibition of Modern Art’ inaugurating speech that ‘it is the expression of a certain vintage which is characterised today by the word ‘modern’, and thus, of course, will be un-modern tomorrow, since it will be out-dated’ (Hitler in Kolocotroni, V. et al (2005), p561). Art and Design responded to the forces of Modernity, working to achieve a global method of communicative understanding and, to a degree; we are still feeling the repercussions of this because this is something we still strive for in today’s world. Robert Hughes commented that ‘The modernist achievement will continue to affect culture for decades to come, because it was so large, so imposing, and so irrefutably convincing’ (Hughes, R in Bocola, S. (1999), p569). The previous paragraphs evidences examples of contemporary Modernism, proving that, even though Modernism developed as an era between the late 19th and early 20th century, we have kept the integral ideals and upheld the beliefs that were brand new centuries ago. As Vignelli demanded, ‘Long Live the Modern movement!’ (Vignelli in Bierut, M et al, (1994), p52).


Word Count: 3,215

Bibliography:
1.     Aynsley, J (2004) ‘Pioneers of Modern Graphic Design: A Complete History’ 2nd ed., London: Octopus Publishing Group Ltd –p66, p122-123

2.     Barnard, M (2005) ‘Graphic Design As Communication’ 1st ed., Oxon: Routledge –p112-113, p114, p116, p124-128

3.     Bierut, M.  Drenttel, W. Heller, S. & Holland, D. K. (1994) ‘Looking Closer- Critical Writings on Graphic Design’ Allworth Press- p51-52

4.     Bocola, S (1999) ‘The Art Of Modernism: Art, Culture and Society from Goya to the Present Day’ 1st ed., Munich: Prestel Verlag- p569

5.     Burke, C. (2007) ‘Active Literature: Jan Tschichold and New Typography’, 1 ed., London: Hyphen Press- p132

6.     Garfield, S. (2011) ‘Just My Type’ 2nd ed., London: Profile Books- p134

7.     Greenhalgh, P. (2005) ‘The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism’ 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p113, p223

8.     Hollis, R. (2001) ‘Graphic Design: A Concise History’ 2nd ed., London: Thames & Hudson- p54

9.     Kolocotroni, V. Goldman, J. & Taxidou, O. (1998) ‘Modernism: An Anthology of Sources and Documents’ 1st ed., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press- p77, p105-p107, p301, p303, p561
10.  Jobling, P. & Crowley, D. (1996) ‘Graphic Design: Reproduction & Representation Since 1800’ 1 ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press- p140, p141

11.  Meecham, P. & Sheldon, J. (2005) ‘Modern Art: A Critical Introduction’ 2nd ed., Oxon: Routledge- p140

Image Sources:

 (Fig 1.) ‘TINTE’ (1924) by El Lissitzsky
Barnard, M (2005) ‘Graphic Design As Communication’ 1st ed., Oxon: Routledge –p116
(Fig 2.) “Villa Savoye” (1928) by Le Corbusier
Greenhalgh, P. (2005) “ The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism” 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p225
(Fig 3.) “Universe” (1926) by Herbert Bayer
Aynsley, J (2004) “Pioneers of Modern Graphic Design: A Complete History” 2nd ed., London: Octopus Publishing Group Ltd –p62
(Fig 4.)  “The Bauhaus” (1925) by Walter Groupius
Greenhalgh, P. (2005) “ The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts- From the Enlightenment to Post-Modernism” 1st ed., London: V & A Publications- p167
(Fig 5.)"Neue Grafik Magazine" (1958- 1965) by LMNV Magazine Archive (2011)
"Neue Grafik Magazine" [Internet] Available from http://magazinearchive.co/portfolio/neue-grafik-magazine (Accessed 23rd October 2012)
(Fig 6.) “Helvetica” (2006) by Experimental Jetset
Coles, S. (2012) “Posters for the film ‘Helvetica’” [Weblog] 3rd December Fonts In Use Available from http://fontsinuse.com/uses/2594/posters-for-the-film-helvetica (Accessed 18th January 2013)
(Fig 7.) “Helvetica” (1960) by Eduard Hoffman & Max Miedinger
Idenitfont (n.d) “Helvetica” [Internet] Available from http://www.identifont.com/find?font=helvetica&q=Go (Accessed 18th January 2012)
(Fig 8.) “iPod Nano” (2003) by Apple
eweek. (2003) “Apple ipod nano, iTunes phone” [Internet] 28th May Available from http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Apple/Apple-iPod-nano-iTunes-phone/6/ (Accessed 18th January 2013)

Feedback from Richard:

Essay Feedback from Richard within a Feedback Tutorial

After handing in my first copy of my essay, I was given some informative feedback which would go on to help structure my essay when I would improve it. I have to proof read my essay as it had grammatical errors within it. I have to do this by going through my essay and condensing it at the same time to shorten my sentences so it is more concise. My essay has a strange structure so I am to extend the points I have made on Bernard's chapter as these points are more what he is after in regards to style and analysis. I need to pick another example to talk about in more detail and analyse it in the same way as I have done for Bernard. I am determined to follow all of these points and improve on every one of them so that I can improve my essay to a greater extent so it is more academic